City of Angels (1998)
Runtime: 2 hrs 2 mins
Synopsis: Based in part on Wim Wenders's 1988 film, WINGS OF DESIRE, this is the story of Seth (Nicolas Cage), an angel who wanders the Los Angeles area invisible to humans. As someone's death approaches, he spends time near that person and becomes visible while acting as traveling companion during the... Based in part on Wim Wenders's 1988 film, WINGS OF DESIRE, this is the story of Seth (Nicolas Cage), an angel who wanders the Los Angeles area invisible to humans. As someone's death approaches, he spends time near that person and becomes visible while acting as traveling companion during the trip to the great hereafter. His discovery of a distraught heart surgeon, Maggie (Meg Ryan), inspires him to forego his immortality and exist on earth with her as a feeling and mortal entity. [More]
Genre: Dramas
Starring: Nicolas Cage, Meg Ryan, Dennis Franz, Andre Braugher, Colm Feore
Screenwriter: Dana Stevens
Producer: Dawn Steel, Charles Roven
Composer: Gabriel Yared
Buy It On DVD
Reviews
Strains to achieve the enchantingly sublime, but ends up sinking to the depressingly ridiculous.
As a remake it's not as poetic as Wenders' masterpiece Wings of Desire, but it's supremely mounted (by ace lenser John Seale) and contains touching performances from Nicolas Cage and Meg Ryan deviating from their respective screen images.
Funnier than Wenders' version, and it also succeeds in visualising LA as a magical city while dealing intelligently with the themes of mortality, sacrifice, free will, and the mixed blessings of the human condition.
An emotionally uninvolving flick that attempts to play on the heart strings of the viewer and fails in its effort.
City of Angels is the sort of compromised movie that could have been almost good, but decided to be a great big hit instead.
City of Angels raises theological questions, albeit in a somewhat pedestrian manner, and makes them an integral part of its otherwise formulaic plot.
Superb imagery can't compensate for deficiencies of Dana Steven's script and can't hide the formulaic nature of this film.
This useless remake lacks the sheer ethereal beauty of the original Wings of Desire.
Why would anyone remake Wim Wenders' masterpiece, Wings of Desire? Certainly not for artistic reasons.
Marries romance and faith in a love story as charming as a handmade valentine. It is so lovely to look at and so sincere in intent that its flaws don't matter much.
Walking out of the theater, I felt different. The film made me realize how wonderful life could be, how a thing as simple as wind on your face or the taste of a pear had value.
My face had been locked in that goofy, awestruck expression you experience only in Spielberg movies. City of Angels demonstrates the best kind of emotionally manipulative filmmaking.
I know a movie is good when I totally cease taking notes and then can find no adjectives to jot down. I was enthralled and yet not stupefied.
Una de esas que gustan cada vez más, a medida que se ve y se vuelve a ver.
Not a typical Hollywood movie. It is beautifully filmed in lush colors by cinematographer John Seale, whose sweeping aerial shots and golden lighting make Los Angeles into an almost unrecognizable new world.
Related Forums
by: vlygrl11 9/7/07
by: LeftCoastEgo 9/3/07
News
posted by Tim Ryan September 15, 2005
This week at the movies brings us a supernatural romance ("Just Like Heaven"), a jaded arms dealer...


Top Critic