And Starring Pancho Villa as Himself

Audience Reviews

View More

Claudiu I @Clausion Nov 28, 2023 It seems a bit goofy and childish, but when I found he is almost correct from history point of view I dropped the jaw. See more Michael W @mawilps Mar 20, 2023 This biopic movie was great. Antonio Banderas, Eion Bailey, Michael McKean, Alan Arkin, Jim Broadbent, and the rest of the cast did a great job in this movie. This true story about the making of the movie about The Life of Pancho Villa was dramatic, intense, and action-packed. It's about making an epic film about a legendary hero of Mexico. If you're a member of HBO Max, you should watch this movie sometime. It's worth watching. See more Per S @RT83737705 Jul 24, 2020 Absolutely an interesting story and a grand movie - much because it says a lot about movies meant in the early days, and due to the costly production design with scenografic realism, and true locations and extras. However, as a story it still lacks some engagement and balance. Banderas' portayal of Pancho Villa gets animated and loses credibility. Some of the other characters are also on the verge to being parodies. Too bad - this could have become a classic. See more May 2, 2016 As a portrait of Villa (though a snapshot) this was highly accurate in capturing his character and persona as well as the general style of fighting and Villista mystique. Having just finished reading _Villa and Zapata_ I rather enjoyed this movie. See more Oct 21, 2013 Well written screenplay conveys the true story of the absurdity of American business. Dashingly photographed with attention to the lighting, for a screen filled delight for the eyes. Believable acting makes the realism harsh and fun as we watch a real war with people dying. Health and safety was ignored during the original filming and Mexicans died. Nibbles: Mixiotes, Carnitas. See more Sep 12, 2013 The movie begins with a bunch of elitist white men bickering about how they are going to make and profit from a live-action film of Pancho Villa as himself and his revolutionary Mexican army. I try to stay away from films about films. I appreciate Hollywood film and its history but movies about movie making tends to lose my interest. As this film moves along, we begin to see more of who Pancho Villa was and what his passions and motives were. The story seemed to shed light on Villa's life that is otherwise ignored or forgotten in history. Banderas is the perfect Pancho Villa. No one could do it better. Unfortunately, the lead actor alongside Banderas was miscast in my opinion, (Eion Bailey). Alan Arkin's appearances are infrequent, which is good in my opinion because his humor and ruthless violence were tasteless and out of place. Its always nice to see Arken, even when he's collecting teeth from dead bodies, but his presence is a typical American filmmaker tactic to bring comic relief and bravo-machismo which relieved the film of some of its authenticity. A commendable effort for a TV movie, (HBO). Still, the romanticizing of war and killing in light of making a movie (within a movie) strikes a moral chord for me. Even when it seemed that Frank Thayer (Bailey) and his small film crew became invested in more than just making a movie, they were willing to risk the lives of Pancho's Villistas in order to "get a better picture". The whole idea behind this is absurd. I don't care about movie contract disputes in the middle of the Mexican Revolution. But this film tries to make you care. an execution speaks many words and tells a sad story. Many times in this picture people lose their life in the blink of an eye and it just serves as background noise, a prop, a distraction. See more Read all reviews

And Starring Pancho Villa as Himself

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING