A Nightmare on Elm Street

Audience Reviews

View More

Charles T @CharlesGaming1000 21h Welp, this was a shitty remake See more diogo13 T @Tua_mera 2d Não foi tão assustador quanto eu imaginava. See more John K @WQCMI May 14 This should never have been made. It was boring, unmemorable and Jackie Earle Haley looks terrible as Freddy Kruger. Plus I don't like the CGI in this. See more Euler N @RT67114604 Apr 26 Why is Freddy so serious? The producers must have absolutely loved this picture—it's the safest, most by-the-numbers version imaginable: a "badass" villain, attractive women, an all-white cast, a paint-by-numbers script, and near-nudity that carefully avoids showing anything. The original films weren’t masterpieces, so we can’t expect much—but at least they had some personality. This one mostly coasts on nostalgia, and even that wears thin halfway through. See more Gage A. @RT15462219 Apr 24 I wasnt a big fan of this film, but I love freddys new design could be better to make freddy scarier See more Chris P @Xiao_Proxies Apr 13 The 2010 remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street isn't quite the disaster many claim it to be. Taken as a standalone horror movie, it works reasonably well: it has a darker modern look, a few decent scares, and maintains a steady pace that makes it watchable from start to finish. That said, as a remake of Wes Craven's 1984 masterpiece, it falls far short. Freddy lacks the sinister charisma that made him iconic, the dream sequences feel generic, and the film struggles to recreate the surreal terror of the original. Instead, it ends up as another conventional slasher with a familiar name attached. It's not terrible as a basic horror film, but a weak and disappointing remake when compared to the original classic. See more Read all reviews

A Nightmare on Elm Street

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING