Dark House

Audience Reviews

View More

justin t @RT08580778 Feb 15, 2022 Solid sound design with good use of surround. The picture looked boring. Very unimaginative story, totally unbelievable and a bit of a mess. Barely acceptable horror film lacking anything engaging. See more Jul 22, 2014 A campy, scary good time. Jeffrey Combs is still awesome! The effects aren't all that great, the acting is pretty shaky overall, but the story is interesting and, best of all, it's got that late 80's, early 90's charm. Who says camp is dead?? :-D A very fun 7.5/10. See more Mar 12, 2014 This is one of those films that you want to laugh at but at the same time can't. The effects alone are what make this film worth watching. A must see for any horror fan!!!! See more Feb 11, 2014 Dark House (Darin Scott, 2009) IMDB lists three movies with the title Dark House. Interestingly, all of them came out in 2009. There's Wojciech Smarzowki's Polish thriller, Will Koopman's Dutch stalker flick, and Darin Scott's American haunted-house story. I haven't seen the other two, so I'm not 100% certain about this, but I would still lay money on the proposition that Darin Scott's is the worst of the three. Plot: an attraction mogul, Walston (Re-Animator's Jeffrey Combs), buys a supposedly haunted house in generic suburban America and plans to turn it into a modern haunted house attraction. To that end, he rigs it up with all sorts of lovely computers in the basement and a bunch of revolutionary effects (big problem with the movie #1: "revolutionary effects" and "bad CGI" really, really do not mix) (oh, and big problem #2: why did all the ghosties not come out and attack all the workmen installing this stuff, who would have had to have been there for weeks, if not months?) and hires a team of young-and-beautifuls as tourguides, models, and folks to dress up. The usual haunted house shtick. Except, of course, the house is really haunted, and one of said young-and-beautifuls, Claire (Once Upon a Time's Meghan Ory), has a connection to the house, and the events therein, that she did not disclose...which makes her a conduit for the nasty goings-on. Or something. It's actually not a bad little idea, if not one that's anything new. But Scott, better known as a producer (on much better films, e.g. Menace II Society), wrote such a ham-handed script, and then cast actors with so much more of an eye towards budget than ability, that even the best idea would have gone horribly wrong. I'm not going to say it's the worst movie I've ever seen. It wasn't even the worst movie I watched that week (my spreadsheet informs me I had been traumatized by Parasitic just three days before). The young and beautifuls are, in fact, young and beautiful, even if most of them couldn't act their collective way out of a paper bag, and when Scott abandons the amateurish CGI and goes for the good old-fashioned gore effects, with rubber prosthetics and squibs, you can convince yourself, for a few minutes at least, that there's a good time to be had here. But unfortunately, those bits are few and far between. ** See more don s @RT97868663 Oct 13, 2013 Supernatural horror set in a "Haunted House" where many foster kids were murdered. The story is a bit cheesy, and the acting is less than stellar, but the effects and the imaginative haunted house exhibits were fairly good. Lots of blood (some that doesn't look real - like in the opening credits) and gore. Better than I thought it would be. See more Sep 19, 2013 A neat modern mix of House On Haunted Hill & Night Of The Demons--Fun House!! See more Read all reviews

Dark House

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING